Apple iPad released
by Mats Hellman on 27.Jan, 2010 under Apple
Just watched Twit.tv live from Apples event. I knew long before the event I would not be exited about the tablet and I’m still not convinced of the success for the iPad. I can’t see where this thing fits in the market. The price is ranging from USD 499 to USD 829. It’s nearly as expensive as a MacBook or a MacBook Pro 13″.
Apple seems to think it will revolutionize press and save newspapers and the book industry. I have my doubts here. As a long time computer user I still PRINT every document that’s longer than 10 pages I have to or want to read. The screen just isn’t as good for reading as paper. Books wont do well on a iPad for me as I do most my reading in bed where a book is far better than an tablet.
It will however be a great device to watch a movie on while on a train or for taking notes in a meeting. But and this is a big but, if I already have a laptop why would I put out the extra money for the tablet.
It still doesn’t do flash, and like it or not flash is something we have to support today. It’s also as restricted as the iPhone and that’s to bad. I would have liked to see more OSX and less iPhone OS in this device. I like to be able to at least change some settings on my devices.
On the positive side it is able to run all the iPhone’s applications so even before the release it has over 140 000 applications and that’s great. Still I don’t see the value of this device if you already have a laptop and a smartphone. Some think it would be great for users reading email and browsing the web but most of them will want to store their pictures locally and do some editing on the pictures. The 800USD version has 64Gb space so it might be usable for this but then cough up a little bit more and you can have a Apple laptop, go for PC:s and you’ll get one much cheaper. The 500USD version has 16Gb so that’s just to small for any real use and to pay 500USD for a book reader, well that’s to much.
Before I pass any final judgment I will go take a look at it when it hit’s the stores in Finland I’ll give it a fair chance even if my first impressions weren’t that great.
Google Chrome for Mac out
by Mats Hellman on 08.Dec, 2009 under Uncategorized
Finally the Google Chrome browser is out for OSX. I’ve been using it on and off in Windows 7 for a few months and now I can finally start using it in my Mac’s also. A big thank’s to the Chrome team for getting it out.
It’s still a beta but works like a charm in OS X 10.5. Go get your’s from http://www.google.com/chrome
Shrink VHD in Windows 7
by Mats Hellman on 07.Dec, 2009 under Windows, Windows 7, XP Professional
I got a new HP Z400 Workstation to my office today and decided to recycle the old DC5800 to someone who needs a trusty workhorse and doesn’t work with memory intensive tasks like Virtual Systems like I do. Even if my old desktop was getting a new life I still wanted to keep it because I’ve installed many tools on it I still use and I like to do some Group policy testing on it.
I found the great tool Disk2VHD by Sysinternals. It converts your physical disk to a VHD file so you can use it in Virtual PC or some other virtualization software that supports Microsoft’s VHD format. Disk2VHD homepage http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/ee656415.aspx
Before you start this you may want to make a backup of your VHD file in case something goes wrong.
Shrinking the VHD for Virtual PC
So I captured my old hard drive and moved it to my new workstation. The file was only 80Gb as Disk2VHD makes it a dynamically expanding disk. Everything looks fine so far. The problem is that Virtual PC only supports 127Gb drives or smaller and my physical drive was 250Gb so booting the drive in Virtual PC didn’t work. I had to get it resized to under 127Gb to get it booting. Googling around I found a few tools but none of them worked the way I needed them to. I had to get my drive size under 127Gb. Some researching later I found that the computer management console, disk management, in Windows 7 was able to mount and shrink my VHD. So fingers crossed I started compmgmt.msc and mounted the drive.
Right clicking on Disk Management and selecting attach Virtual Hard disk worked like a charm. So now let’s shrink the drive. Select your drive from the list and right click selecting Shrink.
After the query is done it will tell you how much it will be able to shrink the volume. If it’s still over 127Gb you can activate the drive in Computer Management and go delete some files. I had a lot of downloaded files I had to delete before I could get it to shrink under 127Gb. When the shrink operation is done we still have to shrink the vhd file. This just made our Windows partition smaller and now we want to get rid of the unused partition from the VHD file to get it under the magic 127Gb line.
VHDResizer to the rescue
All you need to do now is get the software vhdresizer and have it resize your vhd. You can get VHDResizer from http://vmtoolkit.com/files/folders/converters/entry87.aspx
Still no roses
I was hoping this would be the end of the journey and I would be able to boot the system. You could try it at this point but for some reason my system wont boot. I booted into the XP setup and ran FIXBOOT and FIXMBR and the system still won’t boot. So next I tried an Repair install. Victory!
The repair install fixed any issues but I’m tempted to go trough the same again to check where this really fails. I’m sure you can do this without the repair install.
But the result is the same, I have my old desktop OS back and can use the tools when I need to and I didn’t have to reinstall from scratch. If anyone else has had the same problems and solved them without repair install I would be curious to know what you did.
Using Windows Server 2003 32-bit print server with Windows 7 64-bit clients
by Mats Hellman on 05.Dec, 2009 under Vista, Windows, Windows 7, XP Professional
I’ve seen this question come up on discussion forums and other support resources a lot since the release of Vista. Many organizations still use Windows Server 2003 to serve users print services. And the need to upgrade isn’t really behind the corner yet. I know, I feel the same. We still use a Windows Server 2003 R2 as a print server and it it 32-bit, not 64-bit.
Can a 32-bit server handle 64-bit drivers
Short answer, yes. The server uses it’s own 32-bit driver as a interpreter between the spooler and the printer but it can serve clients with the drivers they need. The server really doesn’t care if the drivers it serves to clients are 32 or 64 bit. It can store all of them on the filesystem.
How do I install the drivers?
I’ve been using Windows 7 RSAT(Remote Server Administration tools) to add the drivers to our print server. The important step is to upgrade your current 32-bit drivers. If the driver versions of the 32 and 64 bit differ the server wont recognize them as the same driver. So if you’re using old drivers on your server I’m sorry to say you’ll have to start by upgrading the 32-bit ones first. I suggest you download both the 32-bit and the 64-bit version of the driver when you’re out driver hunting. First upgrade the 32-bit drivers you want to add 64-bit drivers for. I did this directly on the print server and I removed any old versions of the driver. Next add the 64-bit driver. Adding drivers from RSAT is really simple so I won’t go trough it in any detail. Just open Print Manager
Right click drivers and select add driver, add your 64-bit driver. As you can see in the image booth Toshiba drivers have the same version number, the difference is only the Environment.
Group policy edits for Windows 7
Next we’re going to create a group policy to allow restricted users to install their drivers, and we don’t want UAC to disturb or scare them. Side note: if you’re thinking of disabling UAC take a look at a previous article here http://www.nixadmins.net/2009/12/04/why-uac-is-the-best-thing-that-ever-happened-to-windows/ .
Open your Group policy management console and create a new / or add these settings to an old policy. You’ll find the setting under Computer Configuration \ Policies \ Administrative templates \ Printers \ Point and Print Restrictions.
Set the policy to Enabled and set the Security prompts Do not show warning or elevation prompt.
Push the group policy setting to your clients, point to your printer and you’ll be able to install it as a normal user.
Why UAC is the best thing that ever happened to Windows
by Mats Hellman on 04.Dec, 2009 under Server 2008 r2, Vista, Windows, Windows 7
You’ve probably heard, countless times, why the Windows UAC (User Access Control) is the worst function ever introduced in a Windows operating system. Today we’ll look at it from another point of view. I’m saying it’s the best function introduced in Vista and later. Why? Because it makes it easy to elevate your privileges without holding down the right CTRL button or looking for it in any menu. How? I’ll show you in a minute.
Using any operating system with administrative privileges is a bad idea. It doesn’t matter if your running OS X, Windows, Linux or something else. If you’re running your day to day tasks as an administrator(root) you’re not thinking straight. You should be using as little privileges as possible to get the job done, and here UAC does a beautiful job stepping in as a bridge into administrator land.
I run my Windows 7 as a ordinary user and have two separate administrator account for any admin work I need done. I haven’t had any problems running as a user since I started using Windows 7(never really used Vista that much). I can work efficiently as a user and elevate my privileges at any time if I need to.
UAC isn’t really there for the ordinary user it’s there to protect you as an administrator so you won’t make mistakes you might regret later. It makes you think about what you are doing, even if you are running as an administrator, touch something that’s crucial for the OS it will hit you with an prompt to remind you that this could have consequences. Find it annoying? Don’t. Use it, bend it to your will.
Using UAC to elevate privileges.
A typical situation is you start an installer and it asks you for the name and password for an administrative account. This worked long before Vista or Windows 7. But the great part with Windows 7 is that you can ask for elevated privileges REALLY easily.
Let’s take Active directory Users and Computers as an example. You can run it and browse your organizational units and you can se users without administrative privileges. If you need to open an account or reset a password you will have to elevate your privileges OR you can delegate the tasks to your restricted user or maybe even a co-worker who normally doesn’t work in IT(by creating custom MMC:s).
Anyway to elevate just hit the Windows Logo button, type Active Directory move to Active directory users and computers AND hit SHIFT+CTRL+ENTER. Instead of the program starting with your user privileges Windows tries to elevate and sees that your access token doesn’t have the required rights for this. So it shows you the prompt. Easy as 1,2,3.
This is something most corporate administrators are used to BUT I would like to see home users adapt to this workflow as well. In the example I used the builtin Windows search, but you can start up any program like this. Now that you have read how easy this is, PLEASE create an administrative user to use and remove administrative privileges from your normal account. I promise it will feel natural in a few days and you’ll be a lot safer using your computer.
